Concrete Crack Detection, Orientation and Measurement Using a Wall Climbing Robot

Authors

  • Devi Willieam Anggara Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-4885
  • Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • Riyadh Zulkifli Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Rashid Husain Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • Riyanto Pusat Riset Elektronika, Badan Research Inovasi National (BRIN), Serpong, Indonesia
  • Mazleenda Mazni Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim Institute for Smart Infrastructures and Innovative Construction, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • Suhono Harso Supangkat School of Electrical and Informatics Engineering, Institute of Technology Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Crack Detection, Image Processing, Wall Climbing Robot, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Concrete structure damage and severity are determined by examining the width of cracks in various forms. This categorisation of cracks is based on their specific types, which is crucial for engineers and professionals. It allows them to efficiently prioritise maintenance and repair efforts, extending the lifespan of concrete structures. Thus, the classification of cracks is based on the type of cracks needed. This study combines a wall-climbing robot equipped with imaging capabilities to automate the detection and classification of cracks in concrete surfaces. We used machine learning to classify the crack orientation and OTSU to segment the crack shapes. Based on this study, four experiments were carried out using machine learning methods to classify types of cracks, which are SVM, Random Forest, KNN, and Decision Tree. These experiments were categorised using multiclass classification with types of the orientation of crack such as Not crack, Crocodile, Transverse, and Longitudinal. The classification one-class results show that the Decision Tree achieved 86.50%, SVM 99.50%, Random Forest 97%, and KNN 40%. In multiclass classification, Decision Tree achieved 64%, Random Forest 80%, and KNN 37%. The higher accuracy from SVM is achieved at 87%.

Author Biography

Devi Willieam Anggara, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

References

[1] V. R. Gharehbaghi, E. Noroozinejad Farsangi, M. Noori, T. Y. Yang, S. Li, A. Nguyen, C. Málaga-Chuquitaype, P. Gardoni and S. Mirjalili, A critical review on structural health monitoring: definitions, methods, and perspectives, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(4), 2022, 2209-2235.

[2] C. Su and W. Wang, Concrete cracks detection using convolutional neural network based on transfer learning, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 7240129.

[3] K. Kpie Janvier De Thales, Causes and effects of structural cracks, International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology, 8(02), 2022, 64, 2022.

[4] A. Vedrtnam, S. Kumar, G. Barluenga and S. Chaturvedi, Early crack detection using modified spectral clustering method assisted with FE analysis for distress anticipation in cement-based composites, Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2021, 19685.

[5] A. Brusell, G. Andrikopoulos and G. Nikolakopoulos, A survey on pneumatic wall-climbing robots for inspection, 2016 24th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), 2016, 220-225.

[6] G. Lyu, P. Wang, G. Li, F. Lu and S. Dai, A heavy-load wall-climbing robot for bridge concrete structures inspection, Industrial Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research and Application, 51(3), 465-478.

[7] Y. Nishimura, H. Mochiyama and T. Yamaguchi, Propeller-type wall-climbing robot for visual and hammering inspection of concrete surfaces, IEEE Access, 12, 2024, 70963-70972.

[8] W. Qiao, H. Zhang, F. Zhu and Q. Wu, A crack identification method for concrete structures using improved U-Net convolutional neural networks, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 6654996.

[9] M. Mazni, A. R. Husain, M. I. Shapiai, I. S. Ibrahim, R. Zulkifli and D. W. Anggara, Real-time crack classification with wall-climbing robot using MobileNetV2, Communications in Computer and Information Sciences, 2024, 319-328.

[10] M. Mazni, A. R. Husain, M. I. Shapiai, I. S. Ibrahim, D. W. Anggara and R. Zulkifli, An investigation into real-time surface crack classification and measurement for structural health monitoring using transfer learning convolutional neural networks and Otsu method, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 92, 2024, 310-320.

[11] M. J. Awan, Acceleration of knee MRI cancellous bone classification on Google colaboratory using convolutional neural network, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8(1.6), 2019, 83-88.

[12] Rakhmadi, Connected component labeling using components neighbors-scan labeling approach, Journal of Computer Science, 6(10), 2010, 1099-1107.

[13] B. Wang, W. Zhao, P. Gao, Y. Zhang and Z. Wang, Crack damage detection method via multiple visual features and efficient multi-task learning model, Sensors, 18(6), 2018, 1-18.

[14] H. Kolivand, B. M. Fern, T. Saba, M. S. M. Rahim and A. Rehman, A new leaf venation detection technique for plant species classification, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(4), 2019, 3315-3327.

[15] T. Logeswari and M. Duraisamy, An exploration of sturdiness of ant colony optimization technique on brain tumor image segmentation, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(2), 2015, 4329-4342.

[16] M. F. A. Jabal, M. S. M. Rahim, N. Z. S. Othman and Z. Jupri, A comparative study on extraction and recognition method of CAD data from CAD drawings, 2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 2009, 709-713.

[17] M. M. Adnan, M. S. M. Rahim, A. Rehman, Z. Mehmood, T. Saba and R. A. Naqvi, Automatic image annotation based on deep learning models: A systematic review and future challenges, IEEE Access, 9, 2021, 50253-50264.

[18] S. S. N., K. S. and R. G, Review and analysis of crack detection and classification techniques based on crack types, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(8), 2021, 6056.

[19] X. Chen, J. Li, S. Huang, H. Cui, P. Liu and Q. Sun, An automatic concrete crack-detection method fusing point clouds and images based on improved otsu’s algorithm, Sensors, 21(5), 2021, 1-19.

[20] A. Akagic, E. Buza, S. Omanovic and A. Karabegovic, Pavement crack detection using Otsu thresholding for image segmentation, 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO 2018), 2018, 1092-1097.

[21] M. Flah, A. R. Suleiman, and M. L. Nehdi, Classification and quantification of cracks in concrete structures using deep learning image-based techniques, Cement and Concrete Composites, 114, 2020, 103781.

[22] W. Q. Lee, K. H. Lim, C. H. Lim, W. L. Lim and H. E. Yap, Automated building crack identification using enhanced mask R-CNN, ASM Science Journal, 13, 2020, 74-82.

[23] Suat Gokhan Ozkaya and Mehmet Baygin, Advanced machine learning approach for automatic crack detection and classification in concrete surfaces, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(3), 2023, 1367-1379.

Downloads

Published

21-10-2024

How to Cite

Anggara, D. W., Mohd Rahim, M. S., Zulkifli, R., Husain, A. R., Riyanto, Mazni, M., … Supangkat, S. H. (2024). Concrete Crack Detection, Orientation and Measurement Using a Wall Climbing Robot. Applications of Modelling and Simulation, 8, 272–282. Retrieved from https://www.ojs.arqiipubl.com/index.php/AMS_Journal/article/view/757

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)