Optimal Parameter Estimation of PEMFC Model Using an Improved Atomic Orbital Search Algorithm
Keywords:
Chaotic map, Lévy flight , Parameter estimation , Proton exchange membrane fuel cell , Atomic orbital searchAbstract
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have drawn much attention lately for their parameter extraction. It is important to carefully determine the optimal values of the uncertain parameters in the PEMFC model to guarantee accuracy and dependability. However, because of their nonlinearity and multi-variability, PEMFC modeling and optimization present a significant difficulty. Therefore, an improved atomic orbital search algorithm based on Lévy flight and chaotic maps, called CLAOS, was proposed in this study for the PEMFC parameter estimation problem, where the sum of square error was minimized. In order to test the effect of the Levy flight and chaotic maps on the performance of the Atomic Orbital Search (AOS) algorithm, ten different AOS variations were created and applied to solve the CEC2020 and CEC2022 benchmark problem suites. Their results were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, and the best variant was called the CLAOS algorithm. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed CLAOS, extensive simulations and performance evaluations were conducted on the PEMFCs model, where a 250W PEMFC stack was considered. Two search ranges for the unknown parameters and two operational conditions were considered. The performance of the proposed algorithm was compared with the six meta-heuristic search algorithms. Accordingly, the proposed algorithm achieved 4.722489 and 0.152027 for Case-1 and Case-2, respectively, which were the best objective function values among its rivals. Moreover, the results of the CLAOS algorithm were compared with the results reported in the literature for both cases. Accordingly, the CLAOS achieved the minimum error value compared to its rivals for both cases. To evaluate the performance of the algorithms statistically, the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were applied to the results of the algorithms. The Friedman test results show that the proposed CLAOS algorithm ranked first with 1.1667 and 1.0000 score values for Case-1 and Case-2, respectively. All simulation and analysis results demonstrated that the proposed algorithm outperformed its rivals in solving the PEMFC parameter estimation problem.References
[1] W. Gong and Z. Cai, Parameter optimization of PEMFC model with improved multi-strategy adaptive differential evolution, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 27, 2014, 28-40.
[2] H. Rezk, A. G. Olabi, S. Ferahtia and T. E. Sayed, Accurate parameter estimation methodology applied to model proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Energy, 255, 2022, 124454.
[3] Y. Chen, D. Pi, B. Wang, J. Chen and Y. Xu, Bi-subgroup optimization algorithm for parameter estimation of a PEMFC model, Expert Systems with Applications, 196, 2022, 116646.
[4] S. Xu, Y. Wang and Z. Wang, Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder-Mead simplex method, Energy, 173, 2019, 457-467.
[5] M. Ohenoja and K. Leiviskä, Validation of genetic algorithm results in a fuel cell model, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(22), 2010, 12618-12625.
[6] M. Ali, M. A. El-Hameed and M. A. Farahat, Effective parameters’ identification for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell models using grey wolf optimizer, Renewable Energy, 111, 2017, 455-462.
[7] Fathy and H. Rezk, Multi-verse optimizer for identifying the optimal parameters of PEMFC model, Energy, 143, 2018, 634-644.
[8] J. Gupta, P. Nijhawan and S. Ganguli, Optimal parameter estimation of PEM fuel cell using slime mould algorithm, International Journal of Energy Research, 45(10), 2021, 14732-14744.
[9] H. Rezk, S. Ferahtia, A. Djeroui, A. Chouder, A. Houari, M. Machmoum and M. A. Abdelkareem, Optimal parameter estimation strategy of PEM fuel cell using gradient-based optimizer, Energy, 239, 2022, 122096.
[10] H. Ashraf, S. O. Abdellatif, M. M. Elkholy and A. A. El‑Fergany, Honey badger optimizer for extracting the ungiven parameters of PEMFC model: Steady-state assessment, Energy Conversion and Management, 258, 2022, 115521.
[11] H. M. Sultan, A. S. Menesy, M. Alqahtani, M. Khalid and A. A. Z. Diab, Accurate parameter identification of proton exchange membrane fuel cell models using different metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Energy Reports, 10, 2023, 4824-4848.
[12] L. Xuebin, J. Zhao, Y. Daiwei, Z. Jun and Z. Wenjin, Parameter estimation of PEM fuel cells using metaheuristic algorithms, Measurement, 237, 2024, 115302.
[13] Y. Yuan, Q. Yang, J. Ren, X. Mu, Z. Wang, Q. Shen and W. Zhao, Attack-defense strategy assisted osprey optimization algorithm for PEMFC parameters identification, Renewable Energy, 225, 2024, 120211.
[14] T. S. Ayyarao, N. Polumahanthi and B. Khan, An accurate parameter estimation of PEM fuel cell using war strategy optimization, Energy, 290, 2024, 130235.
[15] Z. Sun, N. Wang, Y. Bi and D. Srinivasan, Parameter identification of PEMFC model based on hybrid adaptive differential evolution algorithm, Energy, 90, 2015, 1334-1341.
[16] Z. Yuan, W. Wang and H. Wang, Optimal parameter estimation for PEMFC using modified monarch butterfly optimization, International Journal of Energy Research, 44(11), 2020, 8427-8441.
[17] Z. Yang, Q. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Dai and N. Razmjooy, Model parameter estimation of the PEMFCs using improved barnacles mating optimization algorithm, Energy, 212, 2020, 118738.
[18] R. M. Rizk-Allah and A. A. El-Fergany, Artificial ecosystem optimizer for parameters identification of proton exchange membrane fuel cells model, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(75), 2021, 37612-37627.
[19] M. Alizadeh and F. Torabi, Precise PEM fuel cell parameter extraction based on a self-consistent model and SCCSA optimization algorithm, Energy Conversion and Management, 229, 2021, 113777.
[20] H. M. Hasanien, M. A. Shaheen, R. A. Turky, M. H. Qais, S. Alghuwainem, S. Kamel, M. Tostado-Véliz and F. Jurado, Precise modeling of PEM fuel cell using a novel Enhanced Transient Search Optimization algorithm, Energy, 247, 2022, 123530.
[21] H. M. Sultan, A. S. Menesy, M. S. Hassan, F. Jurado and S. Kamel, Standard and quasi oppositional bonobo optimizers for parameter extraction of PEM fuel cell stacks, Fuel, 340, 2023, 127586.
[22] F. Duan, F. Song, S. Chen, M. Khayatnezhad and N. Ghadimi, Model parameters identification of the PEMFCs using an improved design of crow search algorithm, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(79), 2022, 33839-33849.
[23] B. Deepanraj, S. K. Gugulothu, R. Ramaraj, M. Arthi and R. Saravanan, Optimal parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using improved red fox optimizer for sustainable energy management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 2022, 133385.
[24] S. M. Ebrahimi, S. Hasanzadeh and S. Khatibi, Parameter identification of fuel cell using repairable grey wolf optimization algorithm, Applied Soft Computing, 147, 2023, 110791.
[25] J. Zhou, M. A. Ali, K. Sharma, et al., Improved fish migration optimization method to identify PEMFC parameters, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(52), 2023, 20028-20040.
[26] B. Zhang, R. Wang, D. Jiang, Y. Wang, J. Wang and B. Ruan, Parameter identification of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on swarm intelligence algorithm, Energy, 283, 2023, 128935.
[27] M. Ćalasan, M. Micev, H. M. Hasanien and S. H. A. Aleem, PEM fuel cells: Two novel approaches for mathematical modeling and parameter estimation, Energy, 290, 2024, 130130.
[28] S. Menesy, H. M. Sultan, M. E. Zayed, I. O. Habiballah, S. Dmitriev, M. Safaraliev and S. Kamel, A modified slime mold algorithm for parameter identification of hydrogen-powered proton exchange membrane fuel cells, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 86, 2024, 853-874.
[29] K. Priya, V. Selvaraj, N. Ramachandra and N. Rajasekar, Modelling of PEM fuel cell for parameter estimation utilizing clan co-operative based spotted hyena optimizer, Energy Conversion and Management, 309, 2024, 118371.
[30] M. H. Elfar, M. Fawzi, A. S. Serry, M. Elsakka, M. Elgamal and A. Refaat, Optimal parameters identification for PEMFC using autonomous groups particle swarm optimization algorithm, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 69, 2024, 1113-1128.
[31] S. Saidi, S. Marrouchi, B. N. Alhasnawi, P. K. Pathak, O. Alshammari, A. Albaker and R. Abbassi, Precise parameter identification of a PEMFC model using a robust enhanced salp swarm algorithm, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 71, 2024, 937-951.
[32] H. Alqahtani, H. M. Hasanien, M. Alharbi and S. Chuanyu, Parameters estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell model based on an improved Walrus optimization algorithm, IEEE Access, 12, 2024, 74979-74992.
[33] Askarzadeh and L. dos Santos Coelho, A backtracking search algorithm combined with Burger's chaotic map for parameter estimation of PEMFC electrochemical model, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(21), 2014, 11165-11174.
[34] Z. Yuan, W. Wang, H. Wang and A. Yildizbasi, Developed coyote optimization algorithm and its application to optimal parameters estimation of PEMFC model, Energy Reports, 6, 2020, 1106-1117.
[35] M. T. Özdemir, Optimal parameter estimation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells model with chaos embedded particle swarm optimization, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(30), 2021, 16465-16480.
[36] F. Qin, P. Liu, H. Niu, H. Song and N. Yousefi, Parameter estimation of PEMFC based on improved fluid search optimization algorithm, Energy Reports, 6, 2020, 1224-1232.
[37] M. Ćalasan, S. H. A. Aleem, H. M. Hasanien, Z. M. Alaas,and Z. M. Ali, An innovative approach for mathematical modeling and parameter estimation of PEM fuel cells based on iterative Lambert W function, Energy, 264, 2023, 126165.
[38] M. Azizi, Atomic orbital search: A novel metaheuristic algorithm, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 93, 2021, 657-683.
[39] F. Ali, A. Sarwar, F. I. Bakhsh, S. Ahmad, A. A. Shah and H. Ahmed, Parameter extraction of photovoltaic models using atomic orbital search algorithm on a decent basis for novel accurate RMSE calculation, Energy Conversion and Management, 277, 2023, 116613.
[40] M. Azizi, S. Talatahari and A. Giaralis, Optimization of engineering design problems using atomic orbital search algorithm, IEEE Access, 9, 2021, 102497-102519.
[41] S. Duman, H. T. Kahraman, U. Guvenc and S. Aras, Development of a Lévy flight and FDB-based coyote optimization algorithm for global optimization and real-world ACOPF problems, Soft Computing, 25, 2021, 6577-6617.
[42] S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, Biogeography-based optimisation with chaos, Neural Computing and Applications, 25, 2014, 1077-1097.
[43] M. Abd Elaziz, S. Ouadfel, A. A. Abd El-Latif and R. Ali Ibrahim, Feature selection based on modified bio-inspired atomic orbital search using arithmetic optimization and opposite-based learning, Cognitive Computation, 14(6), 2022, 2274-2295.
[44] G. Manita, A. Chhabra and O. Korbaa, Efficient e-mail spam filtering approach combining logistic regression model and Orthogonal Atomic Orbital Search algorithm, Applied Soft Computing, 144, 2023, 110478.
[45] C. T. Yue, K. V. Price, P. N. Suganthan, et al., Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2020 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained numerical optimization, Zhengzhou Univ. Zhengzhou Technical Report, 2019, 201911.
[46] Kumar, K. V. Price, A. W. Mohamed, A. A. Hadi and P. N. Suganthan, Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2022 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained numerical optimization, Nanyang Technol. Univ. Singapore Technical Report, 2022.
[47] J. H. Holland, Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1), 1992, 66-73.
[48] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Australia, 1995, 1942-1948.
[49] R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 1997, 341-359.
[50] S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, Grey wolf optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 2014, 46-61.
[51] W. Zhao, L. Wang and S. Mirjalili, Artificial hummingbird algorithm: A new bio-inspired optimizer with its engineering applications, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 388, 2022, 114194.
[52] W. Zhang, N. Wang and S. Yang, Hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(14), 2013, 5796-5806.
[53] Y. Rao, Z. Shao, A. H. Ahangarnejad, E. Gholamalizadeh and B. Sobhani, Shark smell optimizer applied to identify the optimal parameters of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell model, Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 2019, 1-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Burcin Ozkaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors hold and retain copyright, and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License CC BY that permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work and article without further permission provided that the original work is properly cited.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online in institutional repositories, website and other social media before and after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
