A Review of Co-Design Approaches and Tools for Control of Cyber-Physical Systems

Authors

  • Noraide Md Yusof
  • Rosbi Mamat
  • Sundet Gamzat
  • Yugai Vyacheslav
  • Tokisheva Gulden
  • Zaharuddin Mohamed Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Keywords:

Co-design, Cyber-physical system, Event-based controller, PID controller, Review.

Abstract

Systems that integrate between computers, communication and control systems are known as Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), and effective control of such systems is challenging. With advancement of the related areas and many systems are inter-connected, CPSs are becoming important elements especially in Industry 4.0 and 5.0. This paper presents a review of co-design approaches for control of CPS, in which desired performance in both layers (cyber and physical) are considered during the controller design. The approach is found to be suited well for CPS. Moreover, in this paper, a special focus is given to event-based control approaches as promising results are reported. In this case, event-based state-space and PID controllers are reviewed. In addition, tools used for the development and performance analyses of co-design approaches are discussed. Several control challenges related to CPS control have also been identified. It is envisaged that this paper can provide valuable knowledge for researchers to embark into the research of control of CPS.

Author Biography

Zaharuddin Mohamed, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Scopus ID: 7005943603ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2719-4138

References

E. A. Lee and S. A. Seisha, Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 2017.

NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2013,

E. A. Lee, The past, present and future of cyber-physical systems, Sensors, 15(3), 2015, 4837-4869.

NSF, Cyber Physical System, 2021, https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21551/nsf21551.htm.

R. Raj, I. Lee, L. R. Sha and J. A. Stankovic, Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution, Design Automation Conference, Anaheim, USA 2010, 791-736.

K. -D. Kim and P. R. Kumar, Cyber-physical systems: A perspective at the centennial, Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1), 2012, 1287-1308.

J. Sztipanovits et al., Toward a science of cyber-physical system integration, Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1), 2012, 29-44.

A. Parnianifard et al., Robust optimal design of FOPID controller for five bar linkage robot in a cyber-physical system: A new simulation-optimization approach, PLoS ONE, 15(11), 2020, e0242613.

S. A. Seshia, S. Hu, W. Li and Q. Zhu, Design automation of cyber-physical systems: challenges, advances, and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 36(9), 2017, 1421-1434.

J. Bradley and E. Atkins, Optimization and control of cyber-physical vehicle systems, Sensors, 15(9), 2015, 23020-23049.

C. Aubrun, D. Simon and Y. Q. Song, Co-Design Approaches for Dependable Networked Control Systems, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA, 2013.

D. Seto, J. Lehoczky, L. Sha and K. G. Shin, On task schedulability in real-time control systems, IEEE Real-time Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), Washington, USA, 1996, 13-21.

J. Eker, P. Hagander and K. -E. Årzén, A feedback scheduler for real-time control tasks, Control Engineering Practice, 8(12), 2000, 1369-1378.

A. Cervin, J, Eker, B. Bernhardsson and K. Erik, Feedback-feedforward scheduling of control tasks, Real-Time Systems, 23(1), 2002, 25-53.

Y. Xu, K. -E Årzén, E. Bini and A. Cervin, LQG-based control and scheduling co-design, IFAC PapersOnLine, 50(1), 2017, 5895-5900.

E. Bini and A. Cervin, Delay-aware period assignment in control systems, Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 2008.

Y. Xu, K. -E. Årzén, E. Bini and A. Cervin, Response time driven design of control systems, IFAC Proceedings, 47(3), 2014, 6098-6104.

Y. Xu et al., Exploiting job response-time information in the co-design of real-time control systems, IEEE 21st International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, Hong Kong, China, 2015, 247-256.

Y. Xu, A. Cervin and K. E. Arzen, Harmonic scheduling and control co-design, IEEE 22nd International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA), Daegu, South Korea, 2016, 182-187.

K. -E. Årzén, A. Cervin, J. Eker and L. Sha, An introduction to control and scheduling codesign, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, 2000, 4865-4870.

R. Bhattacharya and G. Balas, Anytime control algorithm: Model reduction approach, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 27(5), 2004, 767-776.

D. Fontanelli, L. Greco and A. Bicchi, Anytime control algorithms for embedded real-time systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008, 158-171.

Y. V. Pant, et al., Anytime computation and control for autonomous systems, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 29(2), 2020, 768-779.

J. M. Bradley and E. M. Atkins, Coupled cyber–physical system modeling and coregulation of a cubesat, IEEE Transaction on Robotics, 31(2), 2015, 443-456.

K. -E. Årzén, A simple event-based PID controller, IFAC Proceedings, 32(2), 1999, 8867-8692.

A. Cervin and K. J. Åström, On limit cycles in event-based control systems, 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, USA, 2007.

Á. Ruiz, J. E. Jiménez, J. Sánchez and S. Dormido, A practical tuning methodology for event-based PI control, Journal of Process Control, 24(1), 2014, 278-295.

K. J. Åström and B. Bernhardsson, Comparison of Riemann and Lebesque sampling for first order stochastic systems, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, USA, 2002, 2011-2016.

Y. Or and A. D. Ames, Stability and completion of Zeno equilibria in Lagrangian hybrid systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56(6), 2011, 1322-1336.

M. Lemmon, Event-triggered feedback in control, estimation, and optimization. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences: Networked Control Systems, 2010, 293-358.

A. Eqtami, D. V. Dimarogonas and K. J. Kyriakopoulos, Event-triggered control for discrete-time systems, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Baltimore, USA, 2010, 4719-4724.

W. P. M. H. Heemels, M. C. F. Donkers and A. R.Teel, Periodic event-triggered control for linear systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58, 2013, 847-861.

W. Heemels and M. Donkers, Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems, Automatica, 49, 2013, 698-711.

P. Tabuada, Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(9), 2007, 1680-1685.

W. Heemels, J. H. Sandee, and P. P. J. V. D. Bosch, Analysis of event-driven controllers for linear system, International Journal of Control, 84(4), 2008, 571-590.

J. Lunze and D. Lehmann, A state-feedback approach to event-based control, Automatica, 46(1), 2010, 211-215.

D. Yue, E. Tian and Q. L. Han, A delay system method for designing event-triggered controllers of networked control systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58(2), 2013, 475-481.

M. C. F. Donkers and W. P. M. H. Heemels, Output-based event-triggered control with guaranteed gain and improved and decentralized event-triggering, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(6), 2012, 1362-1376.

J. Zhang and G. Feng, Event-driven observer-based output feedback control for linear system, Automatica, 50(7), 2014, 1852-1859.

V. S. Dolk, D. P. Borger and W. P. M. H. Heemels, Output-based and decentralized dynamic event-triggered control with guaranteed LP-gain performance and zeno-freeness, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 62(1), 2017, 34-39.

E. Garcia and P. J. Antsaklis, Model-based event-triggered control for systems with quantization and time-varying network delays, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58(2), 2013, 422-434.

R. Dou and Q. Ling, Model-based periodic event-triggered control strategy to stabilize a scalar nonlinear system, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(9), 2021, 5322-5335.

K. Liu, A. Teel, X. Sun and X. Wang, Model-based dynamic event-triggered control for systems with uncertainty: a hybrid system approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(1), 2021, 444-451.

M. Miskowicz, Send-on-delta concept: An event-based data reporting strategy, Sensors, 6, 2016, 49-63.

V. Vasyutynskyy and K. Kabitzsch, Towards comparison of deadband sampling, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vigo, Spain, 2007, 2899-2904.

S. Durand and N. Marchand, Further results on event-based PID controller, European Control Conference (ECC), Budapest, Hungary, 2009, 1979-1984.

S. Durand, B. Boisseau, N. Marchand and J. F. Guerrero-Castellanos, Event-based PID control: Application to a mini quadrotor helicopter, Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 20(1), 2018, 36-47.

J. Sánchez, M. Á. Guarnes and S. Dormido, On the application of different event-based sampling strategies to the control of a simple industrial process, Sensors, 9, 2009, 6795-6818.

M. Beschi, S. Dormido, J. Sanchez and A. Visioli, Characterization of symmetric send-on-delta PI controllers, Journal of Process Control, 22, 2012, 1930-1945.

M. Beschi, S. Dormido, J. Sanchez and A. Visioli, Tuning rules for event-based SSOD-PI controllers, Proceedings of the 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.

M. Beschi, S. Dormido, J. Sanchez and A. Visioli, Tuning of symmetric send-on-delta proportional-integral controllers, IET Control Theory & Applications, 8, 2014, 248-259.

K. J. Åström and T. Hägglund, Revisiting the Ziegler–Nichols step response method for PID control, Journal of Process Control, 14(6), 2004, 635-650.

S. Skogestad, Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning, Journal of Process Control, 13(4), 2003, 291-303.

J. Romero and R. Sanchís, A new method for tuning PI controllers with symmetric send-on-delta sampling strategy, ISA Transactions, 64, 2016, 161-173.

A. Gelb and W. Vander Velde, Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1968.

J. Romero and R. Sanchís, Tuning and robustness analysis of event-based PID controllers under different event generation strategies, International Journal of Control, 91, 2018, 1567-1587.

A. Ruiz, et al., A unified event-based control approach for FOPTD and IPTD processes based on the filtered smith predictor, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 354(2), 2017, 1239-1264.

O. Miguel-Escrig, J. -A. Romero-Perez, and R. Sanchis-Llopis, Tuning PID controllers with symmetric send-on-delta sampling strategy, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 357(2), 2019, 832-862.

J. Sánchez, M. Guinaldo, S. Dormido and A. Visioli, Validity of continuous tuning rules in event-based PI controllers using symmetric send-on-delta sampling: An experimental approach, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 139, 2020, 106878.

A. O’Dwyer, Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules, 3rd Edition, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2009.

T. Samad, A survey on industry impact and challenges thereof, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 37(1), 2017, 17-18.

K. J. Åström and T. Hägglund, Advanced PID Control, The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, North Carolina, USA, 2006.

A. Pawlowski, et al., Application of SSOD-PI and PI-SSOD event-based controllers to greenhouse climatic control, ISA Transactions, 65, 2016, 525-536.

A. Cervin, J. Eker, B. Bernhardsson and K. Erik, Feedback-feedforward scheduling of control tasks, Real-Time Systems, 23(1), 2002, 25-53.

H. Gawand, A. K. Bhattacharjee and K. Roy, Real time jitters and cyber physical system, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, Delhi, India, 2014, 2004-2008.

S. Balasubramaniyan, B. Subathra, R. C. Hemesh, S. Gurusamy and S. Srinivasan, On simulating processor schedules and network protocols within CPS using TrueTime, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), Madurai, India, 2015, 1-6.

Z. Fang, H. Mo, Y. Wang and M. Xie, Performance and reliability improvement of cyber-physical systems subject to degraded communication networks through robust optimization, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 114, 2017, 166-174.

X. Chen, W. Zhang, T. Qian and W. Tang, Co-simulation of cyber physical microgrid considering economic constraints, 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 2020.

A. Cervin and M. T. Andren, LQG-optimal versus simple event-based PID controllers, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, USA, 2020, 3678-3684.

W. Liu, et al., Reliability modeling and evaluation of active cyber physical distribution system, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(6), 2018, 7096-7108.

A. Y. Mussard, D. B. Rawat and M. Garuba, Data validation and correction for resiliency in mobile cyber-physical systems, 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, Las Vegas, USA, 2019, 1-4.

K. Cao, et al., Edge intelligent joint optimization for lifetime and latency in large-scale cyber-physical systems, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(22), 2022, 22267-22279.

A. Cervin, LQG-optimal PI and PID control as benchmarks for event-based control, Second International Conference on Event-based Control, Communication, and Signal Processing, Krakow, Poland, 2016, 1-8.

X. Chen, W. Zhang, T. Qian and W. Tang, Co-simulation of cyber physical microgrid considering economic constraints, 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 2020.

N. M. H. Norsahperi and K. A. Danapalasingam, An improved optimal integral sliding mode control for uncertain robotic manipulators with reduced tracking error, chattering, and energy consumption, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142, 2020, 106747.

M. Sipser, Introduction to the Theory of Computation, Third ed., Course Technology, Boston, USA, 2013.

M. Horowitz, Computing's energy problem (and what we can do about it), Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, USA, 2014.

K. Liu, A. Teel, X. Sun and X. Wang, Model-based dynamic event-triggered control for systems with uncertainty: a hybrid system approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(1), 2021, 444-451.

Downloads

Published

03-05-2024

How to Cite

Md Yusof, N., Mamat, R., Gamzat, S., Vyacheslav, Y., Gulden, T., & Mohamed, Z. (2024). A Review of Co-Design Approaches and Tools for Control of Cyber-Physical Systems. Applications of Modelling and Simulation, 8, 110–120. Retrieved from https://www.ojs.arqiipubl.com/index.php/AMS_Journal/article/view/516

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.